ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Set 1 Winner
$106.09 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Set Handicap +/-1.5
$1.89 Volume

Completed Match
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Match O/U 22.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Set 2 O/U 8.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Set 1 O/U 8.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Set 1 O/U 9.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Set 2 Winner
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Match O/U 21.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Set 2 O/U 9.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak
$3.0K Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Total Sets: O/U 2.5
$2.99 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Match O/U 23.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Vit Kalina vs Marcel Latak Set 2 O/U 10.5
$0.00 Volume
This market refers to the tennis match between Vit Kalina and Marcel Latak in the ITF Men Irvine, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 4:15PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Vit Kalina' if Vit Kalina advances against Marcel Latak. This market will resolve to 'Marcel Latak' if Marcel Latak advances against Vit Kalina. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
- Resolver: official source.
- Deadline: closing date in UTC.
- Disputed outcomes: handled by moderators within 48 hours.

Comments